Posted: April 7, 2012 in Uncategorized

CollegeFootballTalk

Earlier this week, a report from the USA Today said BCS officials and conference commissioners had decided to group their postseason options into four main categories, although the number of options branching from those categories ran much larger.

But as it turned out, almost all the options were somewhere between the status quo and downright awful. To make matters more confusing — as if three semifinal games to determine one championship game was sensible — a representative from one side of the dreaded Pac-12 option (i.e. option 2) didn’t even know it was an option.

We as a group never discussed that,” Oregon State president and Pac-12 CEO group chairman Ed Ray said to the Wall Street Journal. “This is the first time I’m hearing it. But that doesn’t mean that people weren’t in conversations where all these things came up and somebody suggested it.”

I still…

View original post 248 more words

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s